reconstruct opsinogram → image2dimport fullseye as fs; fs.ledger.sart_reconstruct(sinogram, angles_deg=None, size=None, n_iter=10, relaxation=0.3, initial=None, nonnegative=True) (実装を直接呼ぶなら import tomography; tomography.sart_reconstruct(sinogram, angles_deg=None, size=None, n_iter=10, relaxation=0.3, initial=None, nonnegative=True)、台帳から引くなら opstomography.get("sart_reconstruct"))SART — simultaneous algebraic reconstruction, one angle at a time.
An iterative solver for A x = p where A is the projector: for each
view in turn, project the current estimate, take the residual, and
back-project it with the row and column sums of A as normalisers::
x <- x + lambda * BP_theta( (p_theta - FP_theta(x)) / rowsum_theta )
/ colsum_theta
rowsum is the length of each ray through the grid and colsum is how many rays touched each pixel, so the update is dimensionally a density and does not depend on the grid size. One “iteration” is one pass over all views.
Why it exists next to :func:filtered_backprojection: FBP inverts an integral
transform and therefore needs the transform to have been sampled; SART
solves a linear system and merely does worse when the system is
underdetermined. Measured, it is better at every view count tested (the table
in :func:filtered_backprojection), by 1.43x at 180 views and 2.9x at 8.
The cost is honest and it is the reason this is not the default: 10 sweeps over 180 views is 1800 forward and 1800 back-projections against FBP’s 180 back-projections, measured at 37.7 s against 0.12 s for a 256-px reconstruction — a factor of 312. At 8 views it is 2.14 s against 0.01 s, the same ratio applied to a much smaller number.
nonnegative=True clips the estimate at zero after every sweep. Attenuation
coefficients cannot be negative, so this is a genuine constraint and not a
cosmetic clip, and it carries a large part of the advantage above — measured
on the analytic Shepp-Logan sinogram, normalised RMS with the constraint
against without:
views with without
180 0.0175 0.0300
45 0.0353 0.0626
8 0.1257 0.1428
so at 180 views the constraint alone is worth 1.7x, and it is the only reason SART leads FBP there at all (FBP scores 0.0250, between the two).
:param sinogram: (n_angles, n_detectors), rows = angles.
:param angles_deg: view angles; None -> uniform [0, 180).
:param size: output side; None -> the inscribed square.
:param n_iter: sweeps over the full angle set, 1 .. 500.
:param relaxation: step size lambda, (0, 2). Over 1 the iteration can
oscillate; over 2 it provably diverges, and is refused.
:param initial: starting estimate, (size, size); None -> zeros.
:param nonnegative: clip to >= 0 after each sweep.
:returns: (size, size) float64 image.
:raises ValueError: as :func:filtered_backprojection, plus a relaxation
outside (0, 2) and an initial whose shape is not (size, size).
py -3.11 examples/ct_reconstruction.pyimage2d を入力に取れる)reconstruct)backproject_sinogram · filtered_backprojection
Provenance: tomography.py — TOMOGRAPHY operator registry. この per-op ノートは tools/opdocs.py md が自動生成(手編集しない)。
© 2026 Kazufumi Furuse — Fullseye operator documentation. Licensed under Apache-2.0.